Rigetti Computing (Superconducting) vs Quantinuum (Trapped-Ion) — live market, SEC financial and quantum-hardware data side by side.
QNT leads this data snapshot on 4 of the five headline market, financial, runway, return and dilution measures with comparable data. The better investment still depends on valuation, technology execution and risk tolerance.
QNT is the larger company at $13.69B market cap, about 2.5× the size of RGTI ($5.46B).
QNT reports more revenue ($30.93M vs $7.09M for RGTI, latest fiscal year).
On cash runway — the metric that decides who needs to raise money first — QNT is stronger (113mo vs 78mo).
They take different technical paths: RGTI reports 107 qubits (Physical Qubits (Superconducting, Modular Chiplet)), while QNT reports 98 qubits (Physical Qubits (Trapped-Ion, All-to-All Connectivity)) — raw counts are not directly comparable across modalities.
Momentum = 1Y return · Scale = market cap · Runway capped at 36mo · Gov $ = federal awards · Research = citations + patents. Dollar axes use log scale.
Is RGTI or QNT the bigger company?
QNT is larger, with a market cap of $13.69B versus $5.46B for RGTI.
Which has the longer cash runway, RGTI or QNT?
RGTI's cash runway is 78mo and QNT's is 113mo (current cash ÷ trailing-twelve-month operating burn; "CF+" means cash-flow positive).
What technology do RGTI and QNT use?
Rigetti Computing (RGTI): Physical Qubits (Superconducting, Modular Chiplet). Quantinuum (QNT): Physical Qubits (Trapped-Ion, All-to-All Connectivity). Qubit counts are not directly comparable across different modalities.