Rigetti Computing (Superconducting) vs Quantinuum (Trapped-Ion) — live market, SEC financial and quantum-hardware data side by side.
QNT is the larger company at $20.45B market cap, about 3.3× the size of RGTI ($6.21B).
QNT reports more revenue ($30.93M vs $7.09M for RGTI, latest fiscal year).
On cash runway — the metric that decides who needs to raise money first — RGTI is stronger (82mo vs 57mo).
They take different technical paths: RGTI reports 108 qubits (Physical Qubits (Superconducting, Modular Chiplet)), while QNT reports 98 qubits (Physical Qubits (Trapped-Ion, All-to-All Connectivity)) — raw counts are not directly comparable across modalities.
Is RGTI or QNT the bigger company?
QNT is larger, with a market cap of $20.45B versus $6.21B for RGTI.
Which has the longer cash runway, RGTI or QNT?
RGTI's cash runway is 82mo and QNT's is 57mo (current cash ÷ trailing-twelve-month operating burn; "CF+" means cash-flow positive).
What technology do RGTI and QNT use?
Rigetti Computing (RGTI): Physical Qubits (Superconducting, Modular Chiplet). Quantinuum (QNT): Physical Qubits (Trapped-Ion, All-to-All Connectivity). Qubit counts are not directly comparable across different modalities.