Quantum Market Cap

RGTI vs ARQQ: Which Quantum Stock Is Better?

Rigetti Computing (Superconducting) vs Arqit Quantum (Quantum Security) — live market, SEC financial and quantum-hardware data side by side.

RGTI is the larger company at $6.21B market cap, about 12× the size of ARQQ ($505.24M).

RGTI reports more revenue ($7.09M vs $530.0K for ARQQ, latest fiscal year).

On cash runway — the metric that decides who needs to raise money first — RGTI is stronger (82mo vs 15mo).

MetricRGTIRigetti ComputingARQQArqit Quantum
Market
Price$18.68$29.72
Market Cap$6.21B$505.24M
1Y Return+64.9%-14.3%
52W High$58.15$62.00
52W Low$11.23$11.52
Financials
Revenue (latest FY)$7.09M$530.0K
Revenue YoY-34.3%+80.9%
Net Income$-216,210,000$-35,343,000
Cash & Equivalents$418.25M$36.98M
Cash Runway82mo15mo
Risk
Going Concern FlagNoNo
ATM Offerings (dilution)6626
Daily Short Vol %58.7%65.3%
Beta (1Y vs SPY)0.891.34
Government & Research
Federal Awards Total$8.87M$0
Academic Citations43K
Patents
Quantum Technology
Physical Qubits108
Qubit ModalityPhysical Qubits (Superconducting, Modular Chiplet)
2Q Gate Fidelity99.1%
Cloud PlatformsAWS Braket, QCS (Direct API), Azure Quantum (planned)SKA-Platform (SaaS), SKA-PI (Private Instance)
Roadmap TargetLyra (336 qubits, late 2026 narrow advantage target); 1,000+ qubits by end of 2027; utility-scale ~2027–2029Global enterprise and telco rollout via SKA-CC for MSPs and sovereign private deployments
Company
Founded20132017
HeadquartersBerkeley, CALondon, UK
Employees

RGTI vs ARQQ FAQ

Is RGTI or ARQQ the bigger company?

RGTI is larger, with a market cap of $6.21B versus $505.24M for ARQQ.

Which has the longer cash runway, RGTI or ARQQ?

RGTI's cash runway is 82mo and ARQQ's is 15mo (current cash ÷ trailing-twelve-month operating burn; "CF+" means cash-flow positive).

What technology do RGTI and ARQQ use?

Rigetti Computing (RGTI): Physical Qubits (Superconducting, Modular Chiplet). Arqit Quantum (ARQQ): Quantum Security. Qubit counts are not directly comparable across different modalities.

Go deeper

More head-to-head comparisons