Rigetti Computing (Superconducting) vs IQM Quantum Computers (Superconducting) — live market, SEC financial and quantum-hardware data side by side.
RGTI leads this data snapshot on 3 of the five headline market, financial, runway, return and dilution measures with comparable data. The better investment still depends on valuation, technology execution and risk tolerance.
RGTI is the larger company at $5.46B market cap, about 3.3× the size of IQMX ($1.67B).
IQMX reports more revenue ($36.82M vs $7.09M for RGTI, latest fiscal year).
On cash runway — the metric that decides who needs to raise money first — RGTI is stronger (78mo vs 47mo).
They take different technical paths: RGTI reports 107 qubits (Physical Qubits (Superconducting, Modular Chiplet)), while IQMX reports 150 qubits (Physical Qubits (Superconducting Transmon)) — raw counts are not directly comparable across modalities.
Momentum = 1Y return · Scale = market cap · Runway capped at 36mo · Gov $ = federal awards · Research = citations + patents. Dollar axes use log scale.
Is RGTI or IQMX the bigger company?
RGTI is larger, with a market cap of $5.46B versus $1.67B for IQMX.
Which has the longer cash runway, RGTI or IQMX?
RGTI's cash runway is 78mo and IQMX's is 47mo (current cash ÷ trailing-twelve-month operating burn; "CF+" means cash-flow positive).
What technology do RGTI and IQMX use?
Rigetti Computing (RGTI): Physical Qubits (Superconducting, Modular Chiplet). IQM Quantum Computers (IQMX): Physical Qubits (Superconducting Transmon). Qubit counts are not directly comparable across different modalities.