Rigetti Computing (Superconducting) vs Quantum Computing Inc (Photonic) — live market, SEC financial and quantum-hardware data side by side.
RGTI leads this data snapshot on 3 of the five headline market, financial, runway, return and dilution measures with comparable data. The better investment still depends on valuation, technology execution and risk tolerance.
RGTI is the larger company at $5.46B market cap, about 2.9× the size of QUBT ($1.87B).
RGTI reports more revenue ($7.09M vs $682.00K for QUBT, latest fiscal year).
On cash runway — the metric that decides who needs to raise money first — QUBT is stronger (266mo vs 78mo).
They take different technical paths: RGTI reports 107 qubits (Physical Qubits (Superconducting, Modular Chiplet)), while QUBT reports its qubit count (Photonic Variables (EQC — Entropy Quantum Computing)) — raw counts are not directly comparable across modalities.
Momentum = 1Y return · Scale = market cap · Runway capped at 36mo · Gov $ = federal awards · Research = citations + patents. Dollar axes use log scale.
Is RGTI or QUBT the bigger company?
RGTI is larger, with a market cap of $5.46B versus $1.87B for QUBT.
Which has the longer cash runway, RGTI or QUBT?
RGTI's cash runway is 78mo and QUBT's is 266mo (current cash ÷ trailing-twelve-month operating burn; "CF+" means cash-flow positive).
What technology do RGTI and QUBT use?
Rigetti Computing (RGTI): Physical Qubits (Superconducting, Modular Chiplet). Quantum Computing Inc (QUBT): Photonic Variables (EQC — Entropy Quantum Computing). Qubit counts are not directly comparable across different modalities.