Rigetti Computing (Superconducting) vs D-Wave Quantum (Quantum Annealing) — live market, SEC financial and quantum-hardware data side by side.
QBTS leads this data snapshot on 3 of the five headline market, financial, runway, return and dilution measures with comparable data. The better investment still depends on valuation, technology execution and risk tolerance.
QBTS is the larger company at $6.95B market cap, about 1.3× the size of RGTI ($5.46B).
QBTS reports more revenue ($24.59M vs $7.09M for RGTI, latest fiscal year).
On cash runway — the metric that decides who needs to raise money first — RGTI is stronger (78mo vs 59mo).
They take different technical paths: RGTI reports 107 qubits (Physical Qubits (Superconducting, Modular Chiplet)), while QBTS reports 5,627 qubits (Physical Qubits (Quantum Annealing, Pegasus topology)) — raw counts are not directly comparable across modalities.
Momentum = 1Y return · Scale = market cap · Runway capped at 36mo · Gov $ = federal awards · Research = citations + patents. Dollar axes use log scale.
Is RGTI or QBTS the bigger company?
QBTS is larger, with a market cap of $6.95B versus $5.46B for RGTI.
Which has the longer cash runway, RGTI or QBTS?
RGTI's cash runway is 78mo and QBTS's is 59mo (current cash ÷ trailing-twelve-month operating burn; "CF+" means cash-flow positive).
What technology do RGTI and QBTS use?
Rigetti Computing (RGTI): Physical Qubits (Superconducting, Modular Chiplet). D-Wave Quantum (QBTS): Physical Qubits (Quantum Annealing, Pegasus topology). Qubit counts are not directly comparable across different modalities.