Rigetti Computing (Superconducting) vs D-Wave Quantum (Quantum Annealing) — live market, SEC financial and quantum-hardware data side by side.
QBTS is the larger company at $8.88B market cap, about 1.4× the size of RGTI ($6.21B).
QBTS reports more revenue ($24.59M vs $7.09M for RGTI, latest fiscal year).
On cash runway — the metric that decides who needs to raise money first — RGTI is stronger (82mo vs 72mo).
They take different technical paths: RGTI reports 108 qubits (Physical Qubits (Superconducting, Modular Chiplet)), while QBTS reports 4,400 qubits (Physical Qubits (Quantum Annealing, Zephyr topology)) — raw counts are not directly comparable across modalities.
Is RGTI or QBTS the bigger company?
QBTS is larger, with a market cap of $8.88B versus $6.21B for RGTI.
Which has the longer cash runway, RGTI or QBTS?
RGTI's cash runway is 82mo and QBTS's is 72mo (current cash ÷ trailing-twelve-month operating burn; "CF+" means cash-flow positive).
What technology do RGTI and QBTS use?
Rigetti Computing (RGTI): Physical Qubits (Superconducting, Modular Chiplet). D-Wave Quantum (QBTS): Physical Qubits (Quantum Annealing, Zephyr topology). Qubit counts are not directly comparable across different modalities.