IonQ (Trapped-Ion) vs D-Wave Quantum (Quantum Annealing) — live market, SEC financial and quantum-hardware data side by side.
IONQ is the larger company at $19.18B market cap, about 2.2× the size of QBTS ($8.88B).
IONQ reports more revenue ($130.02M vs $24.59M for QBTS, latest fiscal year).
On cash runway — the metric that decides who needs to raise money first — QBTS is stronger (72mo vs 61mo).
They take different technical paths: IONQ reports 100 qubits (#AQ (Algorithmic Qubits)), while QBTS reports 4,400 qubits (Physical Qubits (Quantum Annealing, Zephyr topology)) — raw counts are not directly comparable across modalities.
Is IONQ or QBTS the bigger company?
IONQ is larger, with a market cap of $19.18B versus $8.88B for QBTS.
Which has the longer cash runway, IONQ or QBTS?
IONQ's cash runway is 61mo and QBTS's is 72mo (current cash ÷ trailing-twelve-month operating burn; "CF+" means cash-flow positive).
What technology do IONQ and QBTS use?
IonQ (IONQ): #AQ (Algorithmic Qubits). D-Wave Quantum (QBTS): Physical Qubits (Quantum Annealing, Zephyr topology). Qubit counts are not directly comparable across different modalities.