IonQ (Trapped-Ion) vs Quantinuum (Trapped-Ion) — live market, SEC financial and quantum-hardware data side by side.
IONQ and QNT are tied across the available headline market, financial, runway, return and dilution measures. The better investment depends on valuation, technology execution and risk tolerance.
IONQ is the larger company at $15.65B market cap, slightly ahead of QNT at $13.69B.
IONQ reports more revenue ($130.02M vs $30.93M for QNT, latest fiscal year).
On cash runway — the metric that decides who needs to raise money first — QNT is stronger (113mo vs 56mo).
They take different technical paths: IONQ reports 36 qubits (Physical Qubits (Trapped-Ion, All-to-All Connectivity)), while QNT reports 98 qubits (Physical Qubits (Trapped-Ion, All-to-All Connectivity)) — raw counts are not directly comparable across modalities.
Momentum = 1Y return · Scale = market cap · Runway capped at 36mo · Gov $ = federal awards · Research = citations + patents. Dollar axes use log scale.
Is IONQ or QNT the bigger company?
IONQ is larger, with a market cap of $15.65B versus $13.69B for QNT.
Which has the longer cash runway, IONQ or QNT?
IONQ's cash runway is 56mo and QNT's is 113mo (current cash ÷ trailing-twelve-month operating burn; "CF+" means cash-flow positive).
What technology do IONQ and QNT use?
IonQ (IONQ): Physical Qubits (Trapped-Ion, All-to-All Connectivity). Quantinuum (QNT): Physical Qubits (Trapped-Ion, All-to-All Connectivity). Qubit counts are not directly comparable across different modalities.