IonQ (Trapped-Ion) vs Infleqtion (Neutral Atom) — live market, SEC financial and quantum-hardware data side by side.
IONQ and INFQ are tied across the available headline market, financial, runway, return and dilution measures. The better investment depends on valuation, technology execution and risk tolerance.
IONQ is the larger company at $15.65B market cap, about 5.3× the size of INFQ ($2.93B).
IONQ reports more revenue ($130.02M vs $32.46M for INFQ, latest fiscal year).
On cash runway — the metric that decides who needs to raise money first — INFQ is stronger (281mo vs 56mo).
They take different technical paths: IONQ reports 36 qubits (Physical Qubits (Trapped-Ion, All-to-All Connectivity)), while INFQ reports 100 qubits (Physical Qubits (Neutral Atom / Cold Atom)) — raw counts are not directly comparable across modalities.
Momentum = 1Y return · Scale = market cap · Runway capped at 36mo · Gov $ = federal awards · Research = citations + patents. Dollar axes use log scale.
Is IONQ or INFQ the bigger company?
IONQ is larger, with a market cap of $15.65B versus $2.93B for INFQ.
Which has the longer cash runway, IONQ or INFQ?
IONQ's cash runway is 56mo and INFQ's is 281mo (current cash ÷ trailing-twelve-month operating burn; "CF+" means cash-flow positive).
What technology do IONQ and INFQ use?
IonQ (IONQ): Physical Qubits (Trapped-Ion, All-to-All Connectivity). Infleqtion (INFQ): Physical Qubits (Neutral Atom / Cold Atom). Qubit counts are not directly comparable across different modalities.