D-Wave Quantum (Quantum Annealing) vs Infleqtion (Neutral Atom) — live market, SEC financial and quantum-hardware data side by side.
QBTS is the larger company at $8.88B market cap, about 3.1× the size of INFQ ($2.82B).
On cash runway — the metric that decides who needs to raise money first — INFQ is stronger (248mo vs 72mo).
They take different technical paths: QBTS reports 4,400 qubits (Physical Qubits (Quantum Annealing, Zephyr topology)), while INFQ reports 100 qubits (Physical Qubits (Neutral Atom / Cold Atom)) — raw counts are not directly comparable across modalities.
Is QBTS or INFQ the bigger company?
QBTS is larger, with a market cap of $8.88B versus $2.82B for INFQ.
Which has the longer cash runway, QBTS or INFQ?
QBTS's cash runway is 72mo and INFQ's is 248mo (current cash ÷ trailing-twelve-month operating burn; "CF+" means cash-flow positive).
What technology do QBTS and INFQ use?
D-Wave Quantum (QBTS): Physical Qubits (Quantum Annealing, Zephyr topology). Infleqtion (INFQ): Physical Qubits (Neutral Atom / Cold Atom). Qubit counts are not directly comparable across different modalities.