Quantum Computing Inc (Photonic) vs Quantinuum (Trapped-Ion) — live market, SEC financial and quantum-hardware data side by side.
QNT leads this data snapshot on 3 of the five headline market, financial, runway, return and dilution measures with comparable data. The better investment still depends on valuation, technology execution and risk tolerance.
QNT is the larger company at $13.69B market cap, about 7.3× the size of QUBT ($1.87B).
QNT reports more revenue ($30.93M vs $682.00K for QUBT, latest fiscal year).
On cash runway — the metric that decides who needs to raise money first — QUBT is stronger (266mo vs 113mo).
They take different technical paths: QUBT reports its qubit count (Photonic Variables (EQC — Entropy Quantum Computing)), while QNT reports 98 qubits (Physical Qubits (Trapped-Ion, All-to-All Connectivity)) — raw counts are not directly comparable across modalities.
Momentum = 1Y return · Scale = market cap · Runway capped at 36mo · Gov $ = federal awards · Research = citations + patents. Dollar axes use log scale.
Is QUBT or QNT the bigger company?
QNT is larger, with a market cap of $13.69B versus $1.87B for QUBT.
Which has the longer cash runway, QUBT or QNT?
QUBT's cash runway is 266mo and QNT's is 113mo (current cash ÷ trailing-twelve-month operating burn; "CF+" means cash-flow positive).
What technology do QUBT and QNT use?
Quantum Computing Inc (QUBT): Photonic Variables (EQC — Entropy Quantum Computing). Quantinuum (QNT): Physical Qubits (Trapped-Ion, All-to-All Connectivity). Qubit counts are not directly comparable across different modalities.