Quantum Computing Inc (Photonic) vs Xanadu (Photonic) — live market, SEC financial and quantum-hardware data side by side.
XNDU leads this data snapshot on 3 of the five headline market, financial, runway, return and dilution measures with comparable data. The better investment still depends on valuation, technology execution and risk tolerance.
XNDU is the larger company at $3.18B market cap, about 1.7× the size of QUBT ($1.87B).
XNDU reports more revenue ($4.62M vs $682.00K for QUBT, latest fiscal year).
On cash runway — the metric that decides who needs to raise money first — QUBT is stronger (266mo vs 53mo).
They take different technical paths: QUBT reports its qubit count (Photonic Variables (EQC — Entropy Quantum Computing)), while XNDU reports its qubit count (Logical GKP Qubits (Photonic / CV-QC)) — raw counts are not directly comparable across modalities.
Momentum = 1Y return · Scale = market cap · Runway capped at 36mo · Gov $ = federal awards · Research = citations + patents. Dollar axes use log scale.
Is QUBT or XNDU the bigger company?
XNDU is larger, with a market cap of $3.18B versus $1.87B for QUBT.
Which has the longer cash runway, QUBT or XNDU?
QUBT's cash runway is 266mo and XNDU's is 53mo (current cash ÷ trailing-twelve-month operating burn; "CF+" means cash-flow positive).
What technology do QUBT and XNDU use?
Quantum Computing Inc (QUBT): Photonic Variables (EQC — Entropy Quantum Computing). Xanadu (XNDU): Logical GKP Qubits (Photonic / CV-QC). Qubit counts are not directly comparable across different modalities.