Quantum Computing Inc (Photonic) vs Xanadu (Photonic) — live market, SEC financial and quantum-hardware data side by side.
QUBT and XNDU are tied across the available headline market, financial, runway, return and dilution measures. The better investment depends on valuation, technology execution and risk tolerance.
QUBT is the larger company at $1.69B market cap, about 1.3× the size of XNDU ($1.25B).
XNDU reports more revenue ($4.62M vs $682.00K for QUBT, latest fiscal year).
On cash runway — the metric that decides who needs to raise money first — QUBT is stronger (266mo vs 53mo).
They take different technical paths: QUBT reports its qubit count (Photonic Variables (EQC — Entropy Quantum Computing)), while XNDU reports its qubit count (Logical GKP Qubits (Photonic / CV-QC)) — raw counts are not directly comparable across modalities.
Momentum = 1Y return · Scale = market cap · Runway capped at 36mo · Gov $ = federal awards · Research = citations + patents. Dollar axes use log scale.
Is QUBT or XNDU the bigger company?
QUBT is larger, with a market cap of $1.69B versus $1.25B for XNDU.
Which has the longer cash runway, QUBT or XNDU?
QUBT's cash runway is 266mo and XNDU's is 53mo (current cash ÷ trailing-twelve-month operating burn; "CF+" means cash-flow positive).
What technology do QUBT and XNDU use?
Quantum Computing Inc (QUBT): Photonic Variables (EQC — Entropy Quantum Computing). Xanadu (XNDU): Logical GKP Qubits (Photonic / CV-QC). Qubit counts are not directly comparable across different modalities.