Quantum Computing Inc (Photonic) vs Infleqtion (Neutral Atom) — live market, SEC financial and quantum-hardware data side by side.
INFQ leads this data snapshot on 4 of the five headline market, financial, runway, return and dilution measures with comparable data. The better investment still depends on valuation, technology execution and risk tolerance.
INFQ is the larger company at $2.93B market cap, about 1.6× the size of QUBT ($1.87B).
INFQ reports more revenue ($32.46M vs $682.00K for QUBT, latest fiscal year).
On cash runway — the metric that decides who needs to raise money first — INFQ is stronger (281mo vs 266mo).
They take different technical paths: QUBT reports its qubit count (Photonic Variables (EQC — Entropy Quantum Computing)), while INFQ reports 100 qubits (Physical Qubits (Neutral Atom / Cold Atom)) — raw counts are not directly comparable across modalities.
Momentum = 1Y return · Scale = market cap · Runway capped at 36mo · Gov $ = federal awards · Research = citations + patents. Dollar axes use log scale.
Is QUBT or INFQ the bigger company?
INFQ is larger, with a market cap of $2.93B versus $1.87B for QUBT.
Which has the longer cash runway, QUBT or INFQ?
QUBT's cash runway is 266mo and INFQ's is 281mo (current cash ÷ trailing-twelve-month operating burn; "CF+" means cash-flow positive).
What technology do QUBT and INFQ use?
Quantum Computing Inc (QUBT): Photonic Variables (EQC — Entropy Quantum Computing). Infleqtion (INFQ): Physical Qubits (Neutral Atom / Cold Atom). Qubit counts are not directly comparable across different modalities.