Quantum Market Cap

QBTS vs QSI: Which Quantum Stock Is Better?

D-Wave Quantum (Quantum Annealing) vs Quantum-Si (Quantum Biology) — live market, SEC financial and quantum-hardware data side by side.

QBTS is the larger company at $8.88B market cap, about 44× the size of QSI ($201.23M).

QBTS reports more revenue ($24.59M vs $2.44M for QSI, latest fiscal year).

On cash runway — the metric that decides who needs to raise money first — QBTS is stronger (72mo vs 24mo).

MetricQBTSD-Wave QuantumQSIQuantum-Si
Market
Price$23.99$0.9241
Market Cap$8.88B$201.23M
1Y Return+61.9%-51.4%
52W High$46.75$3.10
52W Low$12.75$0.69
Financials
Revenue (latest FY)$24.59M$2.44M
Revenue YoY+178.5%-20.3%
Net Income$-355,062,000$-101,339,000
Cash & Equivalents$588.40M$190.40M
Cash Runway72mo24mo
Risk
Going Concern FlagNoNo
ATM Offerings (dilution)12129
Daily Short Vol %59.3%38.8%
Beta (1Y vs SPY)1.191.35
Government & Research
Federal Awards Total$40.0K$30.30M
Academic Citations
Patents
Quantum Technology
Physical Qubits4,400
Qubit ModalityPhysical Qubits (Quantum Annealing, Zephyr topology)
2Q Gate Fidelity
Cloud PlatformsD-Wave Leap (Direct)
Roadmap TargetDual-platform: annealing utility today + gate-model roadmap (Feb 2026) — initial 17-qubit gate-model system 2026, 181 qubits 2028, 10 logical qubits 2030, 100 logical qubits 2032 via dual-rail qubits (Quantum Circuits acquisition)Proteus commercial launch late 2026 (18+ amino acids, ~1,000× throughput); 20 of 20 amino acids by 2027
Company
Founded19992017
HeadquartersBurnaby, BC, CanadaGuilford, CT
Employees

QBTS vs QSI FAQ

Is QBTS or QSI the bigger company?

QBTS is larger, with a market cap of $8.88B versus $201.23M for QSI.

Which has the longer cash runway, QBTS or QSI?

QBTS's cash runway is 72mo and QSI's is 24mo (current cash ÷ trailing-twelve-month operating burn; "CF+" means cash-flow positive).

What technology do QBTS and QSI use?

D-Wave Quantum (QBTS): Physical Qubits (Quantum Annealing, Zephyr topology). Quantum-Si (QSI): Quantum Biology. Qubit counts are not directly comparable across different modalities.

Go deeper

More head-to-head comparisons