D-Wave Quantum (Quantum Annealing) vs BTQ Technologies (Quantum Security) — live market, SEC financial and quantum-hardware data side by side.
QBTS is the larger company at $6.00B market cap, about 13× the size of BTQ ($477.88M).
QBTS reports more revenue ($24.59M vs $230.19K for BTQ, latest fiscal year).
On cash runway — the metric that decides who needs to raise money first — QBTS is stronger (72mo vs 7mo).
They take different technical paths: QBTS reports 4,400 qubits (Physical Qubits (Quantum Annealing, Zephyr topology)), while BTQ reports its qubit count (Software-Defined (Neutral-Atom Emulation & Control)) — raw counts are not directly comparable across modalities.
Momentum = 1Y return · Scale = market cap · Runway capped at 36mo · Gov $ = federal awards · Research = citations + patents. Dollar axes use log scale.
Is QBTS or BTQ the bigger company?
QBTS is larger, with a market cap of $6.00B versus $477.88M for BTQ.
Which has the longer cash runway, QBTS or BTQ?
QBTS's cash runway is 72mo and BTQ's is 7mo (current cash ÷ trailing-twelve-month operating burn; "CF+" means cash-flow positive).
What technology do QBTS and BTQ use?
D-Wave Quantum (QBTS): Physical Qubits (Quantum Annealing, Zephyr topology). BTQ Technologies (BTQ): Software-Defined (Neutral-Atom Emulation & Control). Qubit counts are not directly comparable across different modalities.