Arqit Quantum (Quantum Security) vs Infleqtion (Neutral Atom) — live market, SEC financial and quantum-hardware data side by side.
Direct verdict: ARQQ vs INFQ
INFQ leads this data snapshot on 4 of the five headline market, financial, runway, return and dilution measures with comparable data. The better investment still depends on valuation, technology execution and risk tolerance.
INFQ is the larger company at $2.93B market cap, about 8.8× the size of ARQQ ($333.77M).
INFQ reports more revenue ($32.46M vs $530.00K for ARQQ, latest fiscal year).
On cash runway — the metric that decides who needs to raise money first — INFQ is stronger (281mo vs 8mo).
ARQQ vs INFQ Performance (% return, all start at 0%)
Global enterprise and telco rollout via SKA-CC for MSPs and sovereign private deployments
30 logical qubits by 2026; Illinois fault-tolerant Sqale system designed to demonstrate more than 50 logical qubits in 2027 on a path to 100; 1,000 logical qubits by 2030 (full-stack fault-tolerant)
Company
Founded
2017
2007
Headquarters
London, UK
Louisville, CO
Employees
87
203
Company DNA0–100 rank vs all tracked stocks · missing data = 0
Momentum = 1Y return · Scale = market cap · Runway capped at 36mo · Gov $ = federal awards · Research = citations + patents. Dollar axes use log scale.
INFQ is larger, with a market cap of $2.93B versus $333.77M for ARQQ.
Which has the longer cash runway, ARQQ or INFQ?
ARQQ's cash runway is 8mo and INFQ's is 281mo (current cash ÷ trailing-twelve-month operating burn; "CF+" means cash-flow positive).
What technology do ARQQ and INFQ use?
Arqit Quantum (ARQQ): Quantum Security. Infleqtion (INFQ): Physical Qubits (Neutral Atom / Cold Atom). Qubit counts are not directly comparable across different modalities.