Xanadu (Photonic) vs BTQ Technologies (Quantum Security) — live market, SEC financial and quantum-hardware data side by side.
XNDU is the larger company at $3.06B market cap, about 6.4× the size of BTQ ($477.88M).
XNDU reports more revenue ($4.62M vs $230.19K for BTQ, latest fiscal year).
On cash runway — the metric that decides who needs to raise money first — XNDU is stronger (56mo vs 7mo).
They take different technical paths: XNDU reports 12 qubits (Logical GKP Qubits (Photonic / CV-QC)), while BTQ reports its qubit count (Software-Defined (Neutral-Atom Emulation & Control)) — raw counts are not directly comparable across modalities.
Momentum = 1Y return · Scale = market cap · Runway capped at 36mo · Gov $ = federal awards · Research = citations + patents. Dollar axes use log scale.
Is XNDU or BTQ the bigger company?
XNDU is larger, with a market cap of $3.06B versus $477.88M for BTQ.
Which has the longer cash runway, XNDU or BTQ?
XNDU's cash runway is 56mo and BTQ's is 7mo (current cash ÷ trailing-twelve-month operating burn; "CF+" means cash-flow positive).
What technology do XNDU and BTQ use?
Xanadu (XNDU): Logical GKP Qubits (Photonic / CV-QC). BTQ Technologies (BTQ): Software-Defined (Neutral-Atom Emulation & Control). Qubit counts are not directly comparable across different modalities.